This project has not yet made me happy to be working on  it. I personally don;t find (yet) the purpose. Even though I'm open to learn about it i wish it was more accurarte the satelite visiona nd more flowing when it changes locations. Today I had the esxperince to observe my classmates tours. I first looked at Pacos. His was  very intresting and the places were unusual. I think to improve he could either  make more specific points like the places where he's stayong in every place and things like that. I realized he had descriptions for every place. That was a really good thing because I could undersatnd what he wanted to do. The imgaes , though, took very long to charge and to get moving and load. I think it should be faster and the changes slower. Next project I saw was PP. He ahd  like Paco a really good  trip. His  images were m oved and you could see he moved them with the mouse and not  clicking in the links. More description and less stoping and moving around in such weird movements would be way better. Also I think that the  image qualitty was really abd evern if you can egt close to the house it loads very slow and it becaomes boaring to look at the projects. The last one I saw was Feris. She did it about her summer it was really cool and it was very detail of every palce she went. She should have added a little more detail and information to complete the assignement way better. Same problem but less notuicable in this one anout the  image quality.\
In my project I would add m more detail and notes in th weplaces. The image quality I had was bad but I think I didi pretty good on spoting every  place I was at. The image soudl etake less to load. I would re do it? yes. I think the second time i would eb more czrful and because now i know  how to not let it look bad I'll avoid those things and improve. I think this prokject was fun but boring as to  finding every specific place. I hope  my next experience with Google Earth to be better and less strressing.
Essay France Interwar
Hace 14 años
 
